Keith and Cherie Orum - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         
               taxpayer entitled to a section 6330 CDP hearing based on the           
               second CDP Notice?                                                     
                  A-B4.  No.  The taxpayer is entitled to only one CDP                
               hearing under section 6330 with respect to the tax and tax             
               period.  The taxpayer must request the CDP hearing within 30           
               days of the date of the first CDP Notice for that tax and              
               tax period.                                                            

          Sec. 301.6330-1(b)(2), Q&A-B2, Q&A-B4, Proced. & Admin. Regs.               
               On June 23, 2000, respondent sent petitioners a notice of              
          intent to levy for 1998 at their last known address.  Petitioners           
          did not send a hearing request until December 31, 2001, which is            
          beyond the 30-day filing period required by section 6330(a)(3).             
          Section 6330 does not authorize the Commissioner to waive the               
          time restrictions imposed therein.  Kennedy v. Commissioner, 116            
          T.C. at 262.  The fact that respondent, after the termination of            
          the intervening installment agreement, sent petitioners a second            
          notice of intent to levy on December 14, 2001, did not entitle              
          petitioners to a hearing as contemplated under section 6330(b).             
          See sec. 301.6330-1(b)(2), Q&A-B2, Proced. & Admin. Regs.                   
               Under the circumstances, respondent was not obliged to                 
          conduct a section 6330 hearing as contemplated under section                
          6330(b).  See sec. 301.6330-1(i)(1), Proced. & Admin. Regs.  In             
          place of the section 6330 hearing, the Appeals Office granted               
          petitioners an equivalent hearing for 1998.  Id.  Thereafter, the           
          Appeals Office issued a decision letter to petitioners stating              
          that the proposed collection action was sustained.  Id.  The                






Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011