- 2 - and/or 63301 in which respondent determined the filing of a tax lien relating to those tax years was appropriate. Petitioner timely requested a hearing under section 6320(b). Respondent informed petitioner by letter that respondent had scheduled a conference at respondent’s Appeals Office in Jackson, Mississippi, to be held 8 days after the date respondent sent the letter. In the letter, respondent requested that petitioner provide, not later than 3 days after the date respondent sent the letter, any documents he wished to have considered at that conference. Jackson, Mississippi, is about 180 miles from New Orleans. Respondent has an Appeals Office in New Orleans but did not schedule the conference there. The sole issue for decision is whether respondent was required to provide petitioner an opportunity for a hearing at the Appeals Office closest to petitioner’s residence. We hold that respondent was. See Katz v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 329, 335-336 (2000); sec. 301.6320-1(d)(2), Q&A-D7, Proced. & Admin. Regs. We will remand this case to respondent with instructions to comply with this requirement. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts are stipulated and are so found. 1 Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect during the relevant years.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011