- 9 - its members should tithe ten percent of their income to the church”, we are unpersuaded that tithing was a requirement of Mr. Pixley’s employment. We hold that the Appeals officer did not abuse his discretion in disallowing petitioners’ claimed tithing expenses. V. Petitioners’ First Amendment Challenge The First Amendment of the United States Constitution provides that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”. Petitioners contend that respondent’s disallowance of Mr. Pixley’s tithing expenses for purposes of evaluating their offer in compromise violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. The gist of petitioners’ argument, as we understand it, is that by declining to make allowance for tithing expenses in evaluating petitioners’ ability to pay their taxes, respondent is effectively reducing the funds that petitioners have available to support their religion and diverting those funds to the U.S. Treasury. It may well be true that paying their taxes will leave petitioners less funds to support their religion. But this is a burden, common to all taxpayers, on their pocketbooks, rather than a recognizable burden on the free exercise of their religious beliefs. Constitutional protection of fundamentalPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011