- 2 - Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's Federal income tax of $4,122 for 2000. After concessions,1 the issues remaining for decision are: (1) Whether petitioner, during the year at issue, was a statutory employee under section 3121(d)(3)(D); (2) whether petitioner is liable for self- employment tax; and (3) whether petitioner is entitled to deductions for either employee business expenses on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, or trade or business expenses on Schedule C, Profit or Loss From Business, under section 162(a). Background The stipulation of facts and the exhibits received into evidence are incorporated herein by reference. Petitioner resided in Oakland, California, at the time the petition was filed. Petitioner timely filed her Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for 2000. Attached to the return were three Forms W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, in petitioner's name reporting wages as follows: Big Train, Inc. $35,142.29 Peerless Coffee Co., Inc. 9,373.48 George W. Riley Professional Beauty Center 757.87 1Petitioner conceded at trial that she was not a statutory employee of her employers George Riley and Victoria's Secret. Petitioner only worked for Victoria's Secret for only 1 day.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011