Joseph R. Rollins - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
                                     Discussion6                                      
          I. Excise Taxes                                                             
               a.  Parties’ Contentions                                               
               Respondent contends that petitioner is a disqualified person           
          with respect to the Plan in two capacities:  (a) A fiduciary of             
          the Plan (sec. 4975(e)(2)(A)), and (b) the 100-percent owner of             
          Rollins, the employer sponsoring the Plan (subpars.(E) and (H) of           
          sec. 4975(e)(2)).  Respondent contends that the Plan’s loans to             


               6 Sec. 7491, relating to burden of proof, was not drawn in             
          issue by either side.                                                       
               However, for completeness, and in light of petitioner’s pro            
          se status, we note the following:  Sec. 7491(a) provides for                
          shifting the burden of proof (if certain conditions have been               
          satisfied) with respect to “any factual issue relevant to                   
          ascertaining the liability of the taxpayer for any tax imposed by           
          subtitle A or B”.  Sec. 7491(a)(1).  The sec. 4975 taxes involved           
          in the instant case are imposed by subtitle D; the parties have             
          not suggested any subtitle A or B component.  Accordingly, sec.             
          7491(a) cannot operate to shift the burden of proof in the                  
          instant case.  See, e.g., Jos. M. Grey Pub. Acct., P.C. v.                  
          Commissioner, 119 T.C. 121, 123, n.2 (2002), affd. 93 Fed. Appx.            
          473 (3d Cir. 2004).                                                         
               Sec. 7491(b), relating to statistical information on                   
          unrelated taxpayers, does not apply to the instant case.                    
               Sec. 7491(c) imposes on respondent the burden of production            
          with respect to the additions to tax under sec. 6651(a)(1).  The            
          parties’ stipulation that--“3.  Petitioner did not file any                 
          excise tax returns, Forms 5330, Return of Excise Taxes Related to           
          Employee Benefit Plans, for the relevant taxable periods.”                  
          satisfies this obligation; petitioner still has the burden of               
          proving that the determined additions should not be imposed.                
          Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 446-447 (2001).  But see              
          supra note 2.  Finally, the parties’ presentation of the instant            
          case fully stipulated does not change the burden of proof.  Rule            
          122(b); Borchers v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 82, 91 (1990), affd.              
          943 F.2d 22 (8th Cir. 1991).                                                




Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011