Elliot S. and Darlene M. Saffran - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $7,041 in petitioners’           
          1999 Federal income tax.                                                    
               The issue for decision is whether petitioners are entitled             
          to deductions claimed on a Schedule C, Profit or Loss From                  
          Business, form.                                                             
               Some of the facts in this case have been stipulated and are            
          so found.  Petitioners resided in Milford, Massachusetts, at the            
          time they filed their petition.                                             
               Because petitioners have not complied with the                         
          substantiation requirements of section 7491(a)(2), the burden of            
          proof as to facts relevant to the deficiency remains on                     
          petitioners.  Rule 142(a).                                                  
               Petitioners timely filed their joint Form 1040, U.S.                   
          Individual Income Tax Return, for 1999.                                     
               During 1999, petitioner Elliot Saffran (petitioner) operated           
          a “data processing” business.  On Schedule C, petitioner reported           
          gross receipts of $90,038, total expenses of $70,562, and a net             
          profit of $19,476.  Petitioner claimed Schedule C deductions for            
          car and truck expenses of $6,905, employee benefit programs of              
          $8,328, pension and profit-sharing plans of $12,113, and “other             
          expenses” of $8,741.  The $8,741 amount comprised $3,645 for a              
          computer, $1,726 for software, and $3,370 for parking fees and              
          tolls.                                                                      
               Respondent disallowed $3,243 of the claimed car and truck              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011