The Charles Schwab Corporation and Subsidiaries - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          individuals who represented petitioner’s interests in the                   
          negotiations with Chase in the course of petitioner’s acquisition           
          of Rose.                                                                    
               Although petitioner’s primary interest and goal was to                 
          purchase the Rose customer accounts, Chase was willing to sell              
          the customer accounts only along with the rest of Rose’s assets.            
          At the time of the acquisition, petitioner was the predominant              
          discount broker in the financial services industry with a 42.4-             
          percent market share on the basis of total commissions for the              
          period January through September 1988.  The next largest discount           
          broker was Fidelity with a 17.8-percent market share.  Rose was             
          the fifth largest discount broker with a 2.8-percent market                 
          share.                                                                      
               The Rose customers were generally equity and option traders            
          with characteristics very similar to those of petitioner’s                  
          customers.  Rose used five categories to classify its customers:            
          Cash, cash management, margin, pension, and institutional.                  
          Petitioner used only three categories of customer classification:           
          Cash, margin, and pension.  Petitioner did not generally have               
          institutional customers.  Rose’s institutional customers                    
          represented a relatively small portion of Rose’s customer base,             
          in both actual numbers and the amount of revenue generated.6                


               6 For purposes of these cases and because Rose’s                       
          institutional customers were not significant in number, it                  
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011