MARK W. SENDA AND MICHELE SENDA - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          Gift Tax Returns and the Notice of Deficiency                               
               Petitioners filed Forms 709, United States Gift (and                   
          Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return, for 1998, 1999, and               
          2000.  On those returns, petitioners reported split gifts of                
          $462,379, $183,792, and $14,307.71 for 1998, 1999, and 2000,                
          respectively.  Those amounts reflect the discounted values of the           
          partnership interests transferred to the children, which were               
          calculated by multiplying, for each year in issue, the value of             
          the property petitioners contributed to the partnerships, as                
          reported on the Forms 709, by the percentage of the partnership             
          interests transferred to the children.  Petitioners then applied            
          lack of marketability and minority interest discounts and                   
          subtracted the annual exclusion amount for each child.                      
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that the            
          fair market value of the property transferred to the children was           
          $1,798,647, $791,826, and $164,103 for 1998, 1999, and 2000,                
          respectively.  Those amounts reflect the value of the property              
          that petitioners contributed to the partnerships without lack of            
          marketability and minority interest discounts.                              
          Valuation Discounts                                                         
               The parties stipulate that, if we conclude (1) that the                
          partnership interests, rather than the underlying assets, should            
          be valued for gift tax purposes and (2) that discounts should be            








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011