- 6 - agreement to pay the unpaid liability. This list is not exhaustive, no single factor is determinative, and all factors should be considered and weighed appropriately. Rev. Proc. 2000- 15, sec. 4.03. Respondent agrees that petitioner will suffer economic hardship if relief is not granted. The joint liabilities along with penalties and interest have grown to over $278,000. Petitioner earns $2,000 per month, and Mr. Sjodin is retired earning occasional real estate income and Social Security. This factor weighs in petitioner’s favor. The parties have stipulated that the liabilities are attributable at least in small part to petitioner’s income. Petitioner and Mr. Sjodin are not divorced or separated, and there is no divorce decree or agreement in which Mr. Sjodin assumed responsibility for the payment of the outstanding liabilities. We do not hold it against petitioner that she admirably remained committed to her marriage, and we agree that in certain cases relief is appropriate for taxpayers who are married at the time relief is requested. However, this factor is neutral in our analysis. The parties have stipulated that Mr. Sjodin did not physically abuse petitioner. Petitioner argues that Mr. Sjodin mentally abused her. We presume that her position is that Mr. Sjodin’s controlling and secretive nature was abusive. We do notPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011