Jere J. and Paulette M. Solvie - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
               We must decide1 whether certain amounts (reduced by the                
          deductions attributable to such amounts) that petitioners re-               
          ceived during 1995 and that they characterized as rent are                  
          subject to self-employment tax under section 1402(a)(1).2  We               
          hold that they are.                                                         
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found                
          except as discussed below.                                                  
               At the time petitioners filed the petition in this case,               
          they resided in Hancock, Minnesota.                                         
               In 1968, Jere J. Solvie (Mr. Solvie) began farming.  In                
          1970, Paulette M. Solvie (Ms. Solvie) began farming with Mr.                
          Solvie.  Prior to 1991, petitioners farmed 928 acres of land, 415           
          acres of which they owned.  Third parties owned the remaining 513           
          acres.3                                                                     


               1In addition to the issue that we address herein, there is             
          another determination in the notice of deficiency (notice) for              
          1995 that is computational in that its resolution flows automati-           
          cally from our resolution of that issue.                                    
               2All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in            
          effect for 1995.  All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules            
          of Practice and Procedure.                                                  
               3The parties stipulated that petitioners farmed 928 acres of           
          land, 415 acres of which they owned and 531 acres of which third            
          parties owned.  That stipulation insofar as it pertains to the              
          number of acres that third parties owned is clearly contrary to             
          the record in the instant case, and we shall disregard that                 
          stipulation to that extent.  See Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. v. Commis-           
          sioner, 93 T.C. 181, 195 (1989).  On brief, respondent acknowl-             
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011