- 5 -
November 5, 2003, order be served on petitioner at the post
office box address by certified mail and regular mail.
On March 10, 2004, the Court ordered petitioner and
respondent to file, on or before March 22, 2004, a joint status
report or separate status reports indicating whether and when
petitioner filed Federal income tax returns for 1992 through
1994, and, if so, whether, notwithstanding the outstanding
assessments and the lien controversy in the case at hand,
respondent was examining those returns. Respondent’s status
report, filed March 19, 2004, indicated that petitioner had not
filed the returns, and that, therefore, respondent was not in the
process of examining them.
On April 6, 2004, petitioner filed a status report
requesting an extension to file his brief and the motions he
intended to file with his last extension request (but which he
claimed to have failed by inadvertence to file). In this status
report, petitioner asserted that “severe health problems” and his
preoccupation with separate litigation as “a pro se defendant”
had caused the delays in filing his brief and the motions.
According to petitioner, the separate litigation involved “a
dispute over fines imposed on petitioner by a condominium
association” that had led to foreclosure litigation “involving
the same condominium property that the Respondent has placed a
lien on in the instant case.” Petitioner stated he had not yet
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011