- 4 - At trial, petitioner admitted that he was Shane’s noncustodial parent during the year in issue.3 In 2001, Shane resided with Laurie in South Olympia where he attended high school. At various times throughout the year, however, Shane would freely visit petitioner in Tacoma, which was approximately 25 miles north of Olympia. When asked by the Court whether Laurie was employed or unemployed in 2001, petitioner replied: “Honestly and truthfully, I don’t know.” Petitioners timely filed a joint Federal income tax return for 2001. On their return, petitioners claimed a dependency exemption deduction and a child tax credit for Shane. Petitioners attached a copy of the order to their return. In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed petitioners’ claimed dependency exemption deduction and child tax credit for Shane because: there is a stipulation in the Child Support Agreement. When there is a stipulation the custodial parent must sign a Form 8332 Release of Claim of Exemption for Child of Divorced or Separated Parents. Petitioners timely filed a petition with this Court challenging the notice of deficiency. In the petition, petitioners state: “ENTITLEMENT TO RELIEF - The Court Order from 3 In this opinion, we refer to the parent having physical custody for the greater part of the year as the custodial parent and to the parent who is not the custodial parent as the noncustodial parent. See sec. 152(e).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011