- 3 - On June 23, 2003, respondent’s Appeals officer sent petitioners’s designated representative a letter scheduling the date and time of the requested hearing for July 10, 2003, at 9 a.m. Attached to the letter was a copy of petitioner’s Form 4340, Certificate of Assessments, Payments, and Other Specified Matters, with respect to petitioner’s 1997 tax year. The Appeals officer also noted in the letter that petitioner’s representative could request a phone conference instead of an in-person meeting if he preferred. Neither petitioner nor her designated representative appeared for the scheduled conference. Further neither petitioner nor her representative attempted to schedule an alternative conference date. At this point, the Appeals officer reviewed petitioner’s certified transcript and the information in petitioner’s file. After this review, respondent issued a Notice of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320 and/or 6330, dated July 17, 2003, wherein respondent determined the proposed collection action was appropriate. Petitioner asserts that the Appeals officer refused to allow petitioner to make a recording of the administrative hearing. Respondent, however, points out that neither petitioner nor her representative made a request to record an administrative hearing. Respondent also reiterates the fact that neitherPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011