Jean I. Tedford - Page 17

                                       - 16 -                                         
          and had the transfers recorded in Border’s books, it is clear               
          that petitioner and Mr. Tedford would not have demanded payment             
          if it would have imperiled the financial condition of Border;               
          therefore, repayment was dependent upon the fortunes of Border’s            
          business and was indicative of a capital investment.                        
               This factor favors respondent’s position.                              
               D.  The Right To Enforce Repayment                                     
               An essential element in determining whether a taxpayer                 
          intended to enforce repayment of the advance is whether a good-             
          faith intent on the part of the recipient of the funds to make              
          repayment and good-faith intent on the part of the taxpayer to              
          enforce repayment exists.  See Fisher v. Commissioner, 54 T.C.              
          905, 909-910 (1970).  We must also consider whether, under the              
          facts and circumstances of this case, there was a reasonable                
          expectation of repayment in light of the economic realities of              
          the situation.  See Provost v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-177.           
               We are not convinced petitioner and Mr. Tedford had good-              
          faith intentions of enforcing repayment.  The testimony clearly             
          indicated that petitioner and Mr. Tedford understood Border’s               
          financial situation and did not intend to require repayment of              
          the transfers unless and until Border made a profit.  In                    
          addition, petitioner and Mr. Tedford’s continued lending of                 
          additional funds refutes the existence of a valid debtor-creditor           
          relationship between Border, and Mr. Tedford and petitioner with            





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011