- 31 -
on the ground that it was inconsistent with or contrary to
certain of those admissions and stipulations. The Court directed
respondent to bring to the Court’s attention on brief any of
petitioner’s testimony to which respondent objected as inconsis-
tent with or contrary to certain of the deemed admissions and
deemed stipulations in this case and informed the parties that it
would deem stricken from the record any such inconsistent or
contrary testimony.
The Court deems stricken from the record in the instant case
any testimony of petitioner that is inconsistent with or contrary
to the deemed admissions and the deemed stipulations in this
case. Assuming arguendo that the Court had not deemed such
testimony stricken, the Court would not rely on petitioner’s
testimony to establish his position that he does not have the
unreported income at issue for 1995 and 1996. That is because
the Court found petitioner’s testimony to be in material respects
not credible, general, conclusory, vague, self-serving, uncorrob-
orated, and/or inconsistent with certain other evidence in the
record.
Transactions Involving Petitioner and Weavewood
The following are the unreported income items at issue for
1996 which relate to petitioner’s use in that year of various
checks that were drawn on Weavewood’s checking account, that were
payable to Weavewood, or that petitioner received from or through
Page: Previous 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011