Kevin Thompson - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          of deficiency.  On October 9, 2000, respondent assessed the                 
          deficiency, additions to tax, and interest.  On October 9 and               
          November 13, 2000, respondent sent petitioner notices of balance            
          due with respect to the 1997 liability.  Petitioner responded to            
          the November 13, 2000, notice of balance due with a letter                  
          containing frivolous and groundless arguments challenging the               
          deficiency and the additions to tax.                                        
               On February 19, 2001, respondent issued a notice of intent             
          to levy to petitioner.  On February 26, 2001, petitioner replied            
          in a letter containing frivolous and groundless challenges to the           
          1997 deficiency and additions to tax.  On February 26, 2002,                
          respondent filed a notice of Federal tax lien with the Clerk of             
          Superior Court, Haralson County, Georgia.  On March 1, 2002,                
          respondent issued to petitioner a Notice of Federal Tax Lien                
          Filing and Your Right to a Hearing Under IRC 6320 with respect to           
          the 1997 liability.  On March 4, 2002, respondent sent to                   
          petitioner a Final Notice--Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of           
          Your Right to a Hearing.  On March 28, 2002, petitioner filed               
          Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing, and               
          attached five pages of frivolous and groundless arguments                   
          challenging the 1997 liability and the validity of the various              
          notices respondent had sent him.                                            
               Petitioner exchanged several letters with the Internal                 
          Revenue Service (IRS) Appeals officer assigned to his case to               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011