Donald Tobkin - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         

          is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not           
          be cited as authority.                                                      
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $15,111 in                       
          petitioner's Federal income tax and an addition to tax under                
          section 6651(a)(1) of $8,777.50 for 1995.  After concessions                
          noted hereafter, the issues for decision are:  (1) Whether                  
          petitioner, under section 215(a), is entitled to an alimony                 
          deduction in excess of amounts allowed by respondent, and (2)               
          whether petitioner is liable for the addition to tax under                  
          section 6651(a)(1) for the late filing of his 1995 Federal income           
          tax return.2                                                                
               Some of the facts were stipulated.  Those facts, with the              
          exhibits annexed thereto, are so found and are made part hereof.            
          Petitioner's legal residence at the time the petition was filed             
          was Broward County, Florida.                                                
               On his Federal income tax return for 1995, petitioner                  
          claimed a deduction of $60,000 for alimony paid to his former               
          spouse, Jane Seyler.  In the notice of deficiency, respondent               
          disallowed $38,777 of the claimed amount, thus allowing a $21,223           


               2    Petitioner's 1995 Federal income tax return was a joint           
          return with his then spouse, Marilyn Byrd.  The notice of                   
          deficiency is addressed jointly to petitioner and Marilyn Byrd              
          Tobkin.  The petition was initially filed as a joint petition by            
          petitioner and Marilyn Byrd Tobkin; however, the case was                   
          dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to Marilyn Byrd Tobkin on             
          the ground that the petition was not filed on her behalf by a               
          person authorized to do so.                                                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011