- 2 - is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not be cited as authority. Respondent determined a deficiency of $15,111 in petitioner's Federal income tax and an addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1) of $8,777.50 for 1995. After concessions noted hereafter, the issues for decision are: (1) Whether petitioner, under section 215(a), is entitled to an alimony deduction in excess of amounts allowed by respondent, and (2) whether petitioner is liable for the addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1) for the late filing of his 1995 Federal income tax return.2 Some of the facts were stipulated. Those facts, with the exhibits annexed thereto, are so found and are made part hereof. Petitioner's legal residence at the time the petition was filed was Broward County, Florida. On his Federal income tax return for 1995, petitioner claimed a deduction of $60,000 for alimony paid to his former spouse, Jane Seyler. In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed $38,777 of the claimed amount, thus allowing a $21,223 2 Petitioner's 1995 Federal income tax return was a joint return with his then spouse, Marilyn Byrd. The notice of deficiency is addressed jointly to petitioner and Marilyn Byrd Tobkin. The petition was initially filed as a joint petition by petitioner and Marilyn Byrd Tobkin; however, the case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to Marilyn Byrd Tobkin on the ground that the petition was not filed on her behalf by a person authorized to do so.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011