Robert L. Tovar - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         

               The agreement essentially dealt with a division of property            
          between petitioner and Ms. Lima.  There were provisions with                
          respect to "Past Debts and Obligations", designation of the                 
          marital home to petitioner, a division of their personal                    
          belongings, etc.  Paragraph 17 of the agreement provided:                   
          "WAIVER OF ALIMONY.  Each party waives the right to receive                 
          alimony or spousal support from the other party."  Paragraph 27             
          stated: "This agreement is and shall be deemed to be a Florida              
          agreement, and shall be governed and construed in all respects by           
          and in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida."                   
               Finally, the agreement provided:                                       

                    6.  AGREEMENT IN EVIDENCE/AVOIDANCE OF MERGER.  The               
               parties contemplate the dissolution of their marriage.  This           
               Agreement is intended to be a full settlement of all matters           
               in any dissolution of marriage action, and if accepted by              
               the Court, shall be incorporated by reference in the                   
               Judgment that may be rendered.  However, notwithstanding               
               future incorporation in the Judgment, this Agreement shall             
               not be merged in the judgment, but shall survive the                   
               judgment, and shall be binding on the parties for all time.            

               During his marriage, including the year of the divorce,                
          petitioner was employed as an inventory manager for a national              
          retailer, Best Buy, Inc. (Best Buy).  He commenced his employment           
          with Best Buy in 1995.  At the time of trial, petitioner was                
          still an employee of Best Buy.                                              
               As an employee of Best Buy, petitioner earned stock options            
          that entitled him to purchase stock in Best Buy at a set price of           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011