- 9 - permitted him to conceal and fail to report income. Conducting a cash business does not per se prove fraud. When coupled with attempts to conceal transactions or avoid the requirement of reporting cash transactions, it becomes more probative. See, e.g., Beck v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-270. Dealings in cash, however, do heighten the negative effect of inadequate record keeping, one of the indicia of fraud indicated above. Ferguson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-90; McGirl v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-313, affd. without published opinion 131 F.3d 143 (8th Cir. 1997). The businesses in which petitioner was involved required substantial documentation. Conducting businesses in cash provided petitioner the opportunity to conceal his business income. Fraudulent intent can be shown by circumstantial evidence. Gajewski v. Commissioner, 67 T.C. 181 (1976). Petitioner’s knowledge of the tax law undermines any argument that he was unaware that the income was subject to tax. Petitioner’s actions and behavior were consistent with an attempt to conceal. Finally, petitioner pleaded guilty to willfully making a false return under section 7206(1). After careful review of the record, we hold that petitioner’s entire course of conduct demonstrates fraudulent intent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011