Roger L. Watkins - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
               The contract sale price of petitioner’s interest in the                
          remaining lottery installment payments was $2,614,744.  On June             
          16, 1998, an order from the District Court for the City and                 
          County of Denver, Colorado, directing the Colorado State lottery            
          to make assigned payments to Stone Street was issued.  Petitioner           
          received consideration of $2,614,744 for the remaining lottery              
          installment payments from Stone Street on June 29, 1998.                    
               On petitioner’s 1998 tax return, he reported the one-half              
          share of the annual installment payment awarded in the divorce              
          settlement, i.e., $185,256, due on May 3, 1998, as ordinary                 
          income.  Also on the 1998 tax return, petitioner reported the               
          consideration received for the assignment of his one-half                   
          interest in the remaining lottery installment payments to Stone             
          Street as the sale of a capital asset of $2,414,744, with a basis           
          of zero.  The sale amount represented the price paid by Stone               
          Street, i.e., $2,614,744, minus $200,000 paid to Will Hoover                
          Group as consulting fees for services provided in the assignment            
          to Stone Street.                                                            
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that                
          petitioner’s assignment of his right to future lottery                      
          installment payments to Stone Street was not a sale of a capital            
          asset, and the consideration received was includable as ordinary            
          income in the full amount of $2,614,744.  Further, respondent               
          determined the deduction of $200,000 for consulting fees was                
          allowable as a miscellaneous itemized deduction.  Petitioner                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011