John Weller Wood, Jr., and Magdalena Frances Wood - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         
                                       OPINION                                        
          I.   Violation of Automatic Bankruptcy Stay                                 
               This Court has limited jurisdiction, and we may exercise               
          jurisdiction only to the extent authorized by Congress.  Naftel             
          v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 527, 529 (1985).  Our jurisdiction to              
          redetermine a deficiency depends upon the issuance of a valid               
          notice of deficiency and a timely filed petition.  Rule 13(a),              
          (c); Monge v. Commissioner, 93 T.C. 22, 27 (1989); Normac, Inc.             
          v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 142, 147 (1988).                                   
               Section 6212(a) expressly authorizes the Commissioner, after           
          determining a deficiency, to send a notice of deficiency to the             
          taxpayer by certified or registered mail.  The taxpayer, in turn,           
          generally has 90 days from the date the notice of deficiency is             
          mailed to file a petition in this Court for a redetermination of            
          the deficiency.  Sec. 6213(a).                                              
               An exception to the normal 90-day filing period arises where           
          the taxpayer has filed a petition for relief under the Bankruptcy           
          Code.  Sec. 6213(f).  The filing of a bankruptcy petition                   
          operates as an automatic stay which precludes the commencement or           
          continuation of proceedings in this Court.  11 U.S.C. sec.                  
          362(a)(8); Kieu v. Commissioner, 105 T.C. 387, 391 (1995);                  
          Allison v. Commissioner, 97 T.C. 544, 545 (1991).                           
               Petitioner contends that respondent violated the automatic             
          stay in his chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding under section 362 of           






Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011