John Weller Wood, Jr., and Magdalena Frances Wood - Page 26

                                       - 26 -                                         
               The taxpayer’s primary purpose for holding the property must           
          be determined by reference to his purpose “at some point before             
          he decided to make the sale”.  Suburban Realty Co. v. United                
          States, 615 F.2d 171, 182 (5th Cir. 1980).  Earlier events may be           
          considered in deciding what the taxpayer’s primary purpose was at           
          the time of sale.  The ownership and maintenance of the property            
          must relate primarily to a business, rather than a social or                
          personal, purpose.  Intl. Artists, Ltd. v. Commissioner, 55 T.C.            
          94, 104 (1970); Chapman v. Commissioner, 48 T.C. 358, 366 (1967).           
               Over the years, courts have considered a variety of factors            
          in determining the taxpayer’s primary purpose for holding                   
          property, including (1) the taxpayer’s purpose in acquiring the             
          property and the duration of his ownership, (2) the purpose for             
          which the property was subsequently held; (3) the taxpayer’s                
          everyday business and the relationship of realty income to total            
          income, (4) the frequency, continuity, and substantiality of                
          sales of property, (5) the extent of developing and improving the           
          property to increase sales, (6) the extent to which the taxpayer            
          used advertising, promotion, or other activities to increase                
          sales, (7) the use of a business office for the sale of                     
          property, (8) the character and degree of supervision or control            
          the taxpayer exercised over any representative selling the                  
          property, and (9) the time and effort the taxpayer habitually               
          devoted to the sales.  United States v. Winthrop, 417 F.2d 905,             






Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011