Lucinda A. Yazzie - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         
          that such collection notices be signed.  Everman v. Commissioner,           
          supra.                                                                      
               Federal tax assessments are formally recorded on a record of           
          assessment in accordance with section 6203.  The Commissioner is            
          not required to use Form 23C in making an assessment.  Roberts v.           
          Commissioner, 118 T.C. at 369-371.  Furthermore, section                    
          6330(c)(1) mandates neither that the Appeals officer rely on a              
          particular document in satisfying the verification requirement              
          nor that the Appeals officer actually give the taxpayer a copy of           
          the verification upon which he or she relied.  Craig v.                     
          Commissioner, supra at 262; Nestor v. Commissioner, supra at 166.           
               A Form 4340, for instance, constitutes presumptive evidence            
          that a tax has been validly assessed pursuant to section 6203.              
          Davis v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. at 40 (and cases cited thereat).            
          Consequently, absent a showing by the taxpayer of some                      
          irregularity in the assessment procedure that would raise a                 
          question about the validity of the assessments, a Form 4340                 
          reflecting that tax liabilities were assessed and remain unpaid             
          is sufficient to support collection action under section 6330.              
          Id. at 40-41.  We have specifically held that it is not an abuse            
          of discretion for an Appeals officer to rely on Form 4340, Nestor           
          v. Commissioner, supra at 166; Davis v. Commissioner, supra at              
          41, or a computer transcript of account, Schroeder v.                       








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011