Michael Zarky - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          petitioned this Court seeking an overpayment for that year,                 
          section 6512(b) allows the taxpayer to receive that overpayment             
          to the extent that it relates to amounts paid within 3 years of             
          the notice of deficiency.  See also H. Conf. Rept. 105-220, at              
          701 (1997), 1997-4 C.B. (Vol. 2) 1457, 2171:                                
                    The House bill permits taxpayers who initially                    
               fail to file a return, but who receive a notice of                     
               deficiency and file suit to contest it in Tax Court                    
               during the third year after the return due date, to                    
               obtain a refund of excessive amounts paid within the                   
               3-year period prior to the date of the deficiency                      
               notice.                                                                
               Pursuant to section 6513(b)(1), the $270 that was withheld             
          from petitioner’s interest income was considered paid to the                
          Commissioner by petitioner on April 15, 2000.  Accordingly, in              
          order for petitioner to prevail as to his 1999 overpayment,                 
          (1) the relevant notice of deficiency must have been mailed to              
          him during the third year after the due date of his 1999 return             
          and (2) he must have paid the $270 within 3 years of the mailing            
          of the notice of deficiency.  Given that the notice of deficiency           
          was in fact mailed within the applicable period and that                    
          petitioner was considered during the applicable period to have              
          paid the $270 to the Commissioner, we hold that petitioner is               
          entitled to the $270 overpayment.                                           











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011