- 14 - under the statute. See sec. 6654(a); Niedringhaus v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 202, 222 (1992). The amount of the addition to tax under section 6654(a) stated in the notice of deficiency is based on the return respondent prepared for petitioner before the issuance of the notice of deficiency. Nothing in the record indicates petitioner made the required amount of estimated tax payments for taxable year 2002. Petitioner has not shown that he falls within any of the exceptions to the section 6654(a) addition to tax. See sec. 6654(e); Grosshandler v. Commissioner, 75 T.C. 1, 20-21 (1980). Accordingly, we conclude petitioner is liable for the addition to tax pursuant to section 6654(a) for taxable year 2002. Because of respondent’s concession, the addition to tax applicable to taxable year 2002 requires computation. We have considered all of the other arguments made by the parties, and, to the extent that we have not specifically addressed them, we conclude they are without merit. Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case Division. To reflect respondent’s concession and our resolution of the disputed matters, Decisions will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Last modified: May 25, 2011