Edward W. and Edith M. Arnold, et al. - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         
          income on their 2001 return and that the $17,995 is self-                   
          employment income.                                                          
               2.   Whether Petitioners Have Shown They Were Not Negligent            
               Petitioners argue that they were not negligent because they            
          are correct on the merits of this case and they followed the                
          Secretary’s regulations and procedures.  We disagree.  As                   
          discussed above, we conclude that petitioners are incorrect on              
          the merits of this case.  Petitioners did not comply with Rev.              
          Proc. 87-32, 1987-2 C.B. 396.  Petitioners make no argument and             
          offered no evidence to show that they had reasonable cause.  We             
          conclude that petitioners are liable for the accuracy-related               
          penalty under section 6662(a) for 1999, 2000, and 2001.                     
               To reflect concessions and the foregoing,                              

                                                       Decisions will be              
                                                  entered under Rule 155.             




















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  

Last modified: May 25, 2011