Michael and Marion Balice - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          the Tax Court under section 6330(d).  Weber v. Commissioner,                
          supra at 261-262.                                                           
               During oral argument on the motion, counsel for petitioners            
          admitted that petitioners resided at the 70 Maple Avenue address            
          when respondent mailed the notice of determination, and                     
          petitioners listed it as their current address in their petition.           
          Moreover, respondent’s postal records establish that the notice             
          of determination was mailed on January 29, 2004, by certified               
          mail, to the 70 Maple Avenue address.  See id. at 259 & n.3                 
          (postmarked copy of certified mail list sufficient to establish             
          notice of determination was mailed for purposes of section 6212).           
          We conclude, therefore, that the notice of determination was                
          mailed in accordance with section 6212(a) and (b).                          
               The 30-day period for filing an appeal of respondent’s                 
          determination with this Court expired on Monday, March 1, 2004.             
          See sec. 7503.  The petition in this case, however, was mailed to           
          the Court on March 20, 2004, and was received and filed on March            
          25, 2004.  Consequently, we conclude that the petition was not              
          timely filed.                                                               
               Petitioners’ main contention, as we understand it, is that             
          because the notice of determination was not mailed to them by               
          certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, the                 
          notice of determination was insufficient to start the 30-day                
          period for filing a petition.  To support their contention,                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011