- 10 -
answers, documents, or any other information. On June 4, 2004,
respondent served on both the Basiles and BHC a second set of
interrogatories and a second request for production of documents.
Again, petitioners failed to respond.
On July 21, 2004, respondent’s motions to compel responses
to the second set of interrogatories and second set of motions to
compel production of documents were filed. On July 22, 2004, we
ordered petitioners to file a response to these motions.
Petitioners did not comply with the order. Consequently, on
August 17, 2004, we ordered that petitioners, on or before August
25, 2004, provide respondent with answers to the interrogatories
and produce the requested documents. We warned petitioners that
failure to comply with our order could result in sanctions.
Petitioners continued to disregard our orders.
On July 30, 2004, respondent’s motion to consolidate the
Basiles’ case with BHC’s case for trial, briefing, and opinion
was filed. On August 3, 2004, we ordered petitioners to file a
response to the motion for consolidation on or before August 17,
2004, but petitioners failed to do so. On August 25, 2004, we
granted the motion.
On September 7, 2004, respondent appeared at the calendar
call of the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, trial session, and his
motion for judgment by default was filed. Petitioners did not
appear. Petitioners also failed to provide respondent or the
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011