- 10 - 296,7 which revised the weight to be given to the knowledge factor. Rev. Proc. 2003-61, sec. 3.02, 2003-2 C.B. at 297. Reason to know of the item giving rise to the deficiency no longer is an extremely strong factor that should weigh more heavily against relief than other factors. Rev. Proc. 2003-61, sec. 4.03(2)(a)(iii)(B), 2003-2 C.B. at 298. Actual knowledge is to be considered a strong factor weighing against relief, which may nevertheless be overcome if the factors in favor of equitable relief are particularly compelling. Id. Appeals Officer Baty determined that the knowledge factor did not prevent Tomi from qualifying for relief. Appeals Officer Baty determined that, although Tomi was not entitled to relief under section 6015(b) or (c) because she knew of the items giving rise to the deficiency, she was entitled to partial relief under section 6015(f) to the extent her 1998 liability exceeded the amount of her income tax refund for 2002 of $2,020. Appeals Officer Baty notified Tomi of this determination in a Notice of Determination Concerning Your Request for Relief from Joint and Several Liability under Section 6015 (notice determination) dated December 8, 2003. The notice 7Rev. Proc. 2003-61, 2003-2 C.B. 296, superseded Rev. Proc. 2000-15, 2000-1 C.B. 447. Rev. Proc. 2003-61, supra, is effective for requests for relief pending on Nov. 1, 2003, for which no preliminary determination letter has been issued as of Nov. 1, 2003. Rev. Proc. 2003-61, sec. 7, 2003-2 C.B. at 299. Because no preliminary determination letter had been issued as of Nov. 1, 2003, Rev. Proc. 2003-61, supra, applies to this case.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011