Shuang-Di Sun Bennett - Page 33

                                       - 32 -                                         
          taxpayer’s failure to file the return was due to reasonable cause           
          and not due to willful neglect.  Sec. 6651(a)(1) and (2).                   
               Respondent has introduced evidence sufficient to establish             
          the appropriateness of imposing additions to tax under section              
          6651(a)(1) and (2).  See Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438,              
          446 (2001).  Petitioner’s 1998 return was filed December 13,                
          2000, well after its statutory due date of April 15, 1999, and no           
          application for extension of the filing due date was filed.  The            
          return showed a balance due of $2,748, but petitioner did not               
          remit payment with the return, and the outstanding balance                  
          remains unpaid.                                                             
               Thus, petitioner is liable for additions to tax for filing a           
          delinquent return and failing to pay the tax due unless she can             
          attribute her failures to reasonable cause and not willful                  
          neglect.  There are several established principles that operate             
          against petitioner.  First, a taxpayer cannot rely upon his or              
          her spouse to file a return or pay a tax due for purposes of                
          excusing the taxpayer from section 6651 liability.  See James v.            
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1980-99.  Second, even though petitioner           
          did not actually know about the income from Premium Fresh Juice,            
          she is required to file a return and pay taxes based upon her               
          share of community income.  See United States v. Mitchell, 403              
          U.S. at 196-197.  Consequently, petitioner cannot attribute her             







Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011