Ronald Lee Bonaccorso - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          received by petitioner during the years in issue are specified in           
          section 61, which provides in relevant part:                                
               SEC. 61.  GROSS INCOME DEFINED.                                        
                    (a) General Definition.–-Except as otherwise                      
               provided in this subtitle, gross income means all                      
               income from whatever source derived, including (but not                
               limited to) the following items:                                       
                         (1) Compensation for services, including                     
                    fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar                   
                    items;                                                            
                     *      *      *      *      *      *      *                      
                         (3) Gains derived from dealings in property;                 
                         (4) Interest;                                                
                     *      *      *      *      *      *      *                      
                         (7) Dividends;                                               
          Petitioner’s arguments to the contrary have been consistently               
          rejected and characterized as frivolous in innumerable cases.  No           
          further discussion of them is merited.  See Crain v.                        
          Commissioner, 737 F.2d 1417, 1418 (5th Cir. 1984); Cabirac v.               
          Commissioner, 120 T.C. 163, 167 (2003).                                     
               Petitioner stipulated that he had presented no evidence of             
          basis that would reduce the proceeds he received from the sale of           
          stock and that he offered no proof of any gambling losses that              
          would offset his gambling winnings.  He has not suggested that he           
          had any deductions beyond the standard deduction allowed by                 
          respondent in the statutory notice of deficiency.                           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011