Estate of Wayne C. Bongard, Deceased, James A. Bernards, Personal Representative - Page 57

                                       - 40 -                                         
          distributions from the partnership, Estate of Thompson v.                   
          Commissioner, supra; Estate of Harper v. Commissioner, supra; the           
          partners’ commingling of partnership funds with their own, Estate           
          of Harper v. Commissioner, supra, and the taxpayer’s actual                 
          failure to transfer the property to the partnership, Estate of              
          Hillgren v. Commissioner, supra.                                            
               The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently decided            
          a case in this area, Kimbell v. United States, 371 F.3d 257, 258            
          (5th Cir. 2004).  In Kimbell, the decedent transferred assets               
          including $2.5 million in cash, an active oil and gas business,             
          and royalties to a trust.  The trust contributed the property to            
          a family limited partnership and received a 99-percent pro rata             
          partnership interest in return.  The other partner was a limited            
          liability company (the LLC) owned by the decedent, her son, and             
          his wife.  The LLC contributed $25,500 in exchange for a 1-                 
          percent general partnership interest.  The oil and gas working              
          assets constituted 11 percent of the partnership’s assets.  The             
          decedent retained over $450,000 in assets for her personal                  
          expenses.                                                                   
               The court separated the bona fide sale exception into two              
          prongs: (1) Whether the transaction qualifies as a bona fide                
          sale; and (2) whether the decedent received adequate and full               
          consideration.  The court first examined the adequate and full              
          consideration language and set forth an objective inquiry.  Id.             






Page:  Previous  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011