Dorene Bulger - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          promoted, and operated by Walter J. Hoyt III.2  Petitioner and              
          Mr. Bulger held partnership interests either jointly or as joint            
          tenants with rights of survivorship in three separate “series” of           
          SGE partnership units.  Petitioner wrote and signed numerous                
          checks payable to SGE or the Hoyt organization from her and Mr.             
          Bulger’s joint bank account to maintain their investment in SGE.            
          SGE issued Schedules K-1, Partner’s Share of Income, Credits,               
          Deductions, etc., for 1985 and 1986 to petitioner and Mr. Bulger,           
          which reflected that both petitioner and Mr. Bulger were partners           
          in SGE.  In addition, in 1992, petitioner and Mr. Bulger signed a           
          Power of Attorney and Debt Assumption Agreement in which they               




               2Walter J. Hoyt III also organized, promoted, operated, and            
          served as the general partner of more than 100 livestock breeding           
          limited partnerships from 1971 through 1998.  See, e.g., River              
          City Ranches #1, Ltd. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-150, affd.           
          in part, revd. in part and remanded 401 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir.                 
          2005).  In general, the Hoyt partnerships purchased livestock               
          from related Hoyt entities for no money down and a promissory               
          note.  See, e.g., Durham Farms #1, J.V. v. Commissioner, T.C.               
          Memo. 2000-159, affd. 59 Fed. Appx. 952 (9th Cir. 2003);                    
          Shorthorn Genetic Engg. 1982-2, Ltd. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.            
          1996-515.  The investors in the Hoyt partnerships assumed                   
          personal liability for the partnerships’ promissory notes, made             
          payments on the notes to the Hoyt partnerships, see, e.g.,                  
          Shorthorn Genetic Engg. 1982-2, Ltd. v. Commissioner, supra, and,           
          in return, deducted large partnership losses related to the                 
          purchase, management, and sale of livestock, see River City                 
          Ranches #1, Ltd. v. Commissioner, supra; Mekulsia v.                        
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-138, affd. 389 F.3d 601 (6th Cir.             
          2004); Durham Farms #1, J.V. v. Commissioner, supra; Shorthorn              
          Genetic Engg. 1982-2, Ltd. v. Commissioner, supra; Bales v.                 
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-568.                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011