Gerald A. Bunker - Page 7

                                        - 6 -                                         
          Moreover, section 61(a)(12) provides that gross income includes             
          income from discharge of indebtedness.                                      
               The unemployment condition of American Security’s and                  
          Capital One’s insurance policies was satisfied, and petitioner,             
          as a result, realized economic benefits by the amount of the                
          payments the insurance companies paid towards petitioner’s credit           
          card liabilities during 2001.  As a result of the payments made             
          by the insurance companies, petitioner was relieved of the                  
          obligation of paying $10,800 and $4,448 to the issuers of his               
          credit cards.  In Amos v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 65, 70 (1966),              
          this Court stated:                                                          
               Although petitioner did not receive the amount directly from           
               John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co., it is well settled             
               that income is not limited to direct receipt of cash, Crane            
               v. Commissioner, 331 U.S. 1 (1947); and that the payment of            
               a legal obligation of a taxpayer is income to him even                 
               though such income is not actually received by him, Old                
               Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 279 U.S. 716, 729 (1929);            
               and Schaeffer v. Commissioner, 258 F.2d 861, 864 (C.A. 6,              
               1958), certiorari denied 360 U.S. 917. * * *                           
          The Court, therefore, rejects petitioner’s arguments.  All of the           
          charges on petitioner’s credit cards represented economic                   
          benefits petitioner received.  Petitioner was relieved of his               
          liability to the extent of the amount paid by the insurance                 
          companies during 2001.  Respondent, therefore, is sustained.                
               Petitioner incorrectly contends that the insurance payments            
          on his credit cards are analogous to insurance recovery amounts             
          for damaged property (such as automobiles) where, in the latter             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011