Timothy J. Burke - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          distributive share of the partnership’s taxable income or loss.             
          Sec. 702(a)(8).  As a general rule, a partner’s distributive                
          share of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit is determined             
          by the partnership agreement.  Sec. 704(a).                                 
               Section 1.702-1(a), Income Tax Regs., provides:  “Each                 
          partner is required to take into account separately in his return           
          his distributive share, whether or not distributed, of each class           
          or item of partnership income”. (Emphasis added.)  “Few                     
          principles of partnership taxation are more firmly established              
          than that no matter the reason for nondistribution each partner             
          must pay taxes on his distributive share.”  United States v.                
          Basye, 410 U.S. 441, 454 (1973).  “The tax is thus imposed upon             
          the partner’s proportionate share of the net income of the                  
          partnership, and the fact that it may not be currently                      
          distributable, whether by agreement of the parties or operation             
          of law, is not material.”  Heiner v. Mellon, 304 U.S. 271, 281              
          (1938); see also First Mechs. Bank v. Commissioner, 91 F.2d 275,            
          279 (3d Cir. 1937) (holding that a partner’s share of partnership           
          income was taxable to him for the year in which the income was              
          realized by the partnership even though not distributed to the              
          partner in that year); Chama v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-253           
          (holding that a partner was taxable on his share of partnership             
          gain even though not distributed to him but instead reinvested by           
          the partnership); Johnston v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1984-374             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011