Estate of Robert J. Capehart, Deceased, Ingrid Capehart, Personal Reprensentative, and Ingrid Capehart - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
          allocable to petitioner bears to the net amount of all erroneous            
          items taken into account in computing the deficiency.   The                 
          proportionate allocation can be algebraically expressed as                  
          follows:                                                                    
                                   net amount of erroneous items                      
               X = deficiency x      allocable to the spouse                          
                              net amount of all erroneous items                       
          where X is the portion of the deficiency allocable to petitioner.           
          See sec. 1.6015-3(d)(4)(i)(A), Income Tax Regs.                             
               Under the proportionate allocation method, $2,744.69 is the            
          portion of the $8,225 deficiency allocable to petitioner,                   
          computed as follows:                                                        
          $2,744.69 = $8,225 x $14,204                                                
                                       $42,565                                       
                    a.   Respondent’s Computation                                     
               Respondent computed petitioner’s share of the deficiency to            
          be $2,820.  Respondent computed petitioner’s share of the                   
          deficiency by applying the proportionate allocation method                  
          required by section 6015(d) to the Form 4797 loss and the theft             
          loss ($2,820 = $8,225 x $14,204 � $41,422).  Respondent’s                   
          computation is flawed in that it does not take into account the             
          $1,143 disallowed deduction for medical/dental expenses.                    











Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011