- 2 - for 1989 through 1992.1 Respondent moves the Court to strike for lack of jurisdiction the portion of the petition that seeks relief under section 66(c) and to dismiss that portion of this case accordingly. We shall grant that motion. On our own initiative, we also for lack of jurisdiction shall strike the portion of the petition that seeks relief under section 6013(e) and dismiss that portion of the case. On September 14, 2003, petitioner requested from respondent relief under section 6015 as to each subject year. On February 7, 2005, respondent informed petitioner that he was not entitled to the requested relief. On April 20, 2005, petitioner petitioned this Court to redetermine whether he was entitled to any relief under section 6015, or under sections 66(c) and 6013(e). Petitioner resided in Irvine, California, when that petition was filed. This Court, like all Federal courts, is a court of limited jurisdiction. See Flight Attendants Against UAL Offset v. Commissioner, 165 F.3d 572, 578 (7th Cir. 1999); Estate of Wenner v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 284, 286 (2001). We acquire our jurisdiction from Congress and may exercise jurisdiction over a case only to the extent that Congress has authorized us to do so. 1 Section references are to the applicable versions of the Internal Revenue Code. Sec. 6013(e) was repealed in 1998 by the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-206, sec. 3201(a) and (e)(1), 112 Stat. 734, 740.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011