Jimmie L. Clemons - Page 8

                                        - 7 -                                         
          Cir. 1956); Green v. Commissioner, 66 T.C. 538 (1976).  This is             
          not the present case.                                                       
               In the case of a taxpayer not engaged in the trade or                  
          business of gambling, gambling losses are allowable as a                    
          miscellaneous itemized deduction, but only to the extent of gains           
          from such transactions.  See sec. 165(d); McClanahan v. United              
          States, supra; Winkler v. United States, supra; Gajewski v.                 
          Commissioner, 84 T.C. 980 (1985); Lutz v. Commissioner, T.C.                
          Memo. 2002-89; see also Stein v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1984-             
          403; Umstead v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1982-573.                          
               The parties agree that, during taxable year 2001, petitioner           
          received gambling winnings of $44,833 at the Cherokee Casino.               
          The parties further agree that petitioner incurred gambling                 
          losses, during taxable year 2001, in excess of $44,833.                     
          Petitioner did not report the aforesaid gambling winnings as                
          gross income on his 2001 Federal income tax return.  Instead,               
          petitioner merely offset his gambling income with his sustained             
          gambling losses and did not report either of these amounts on his           
          2001 Federal income tax return.                                             
               Petitioner presented no evidence to show that he was a                 
          professional gambler, nor did he contend that he was a                      
          professional gambler.  On the basis of the evidence in the                  
          record, we conclude that petitioner was a recreational gambler              
          and not a professional gambler.  Therefore, the gambling losses             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011