- 4 - Spruill’s business or personal bank accounts. Petitioner was not in a position to insist upon examining Mr. Spruill’s business receipts, deposits, and income, as he subjected petitioner to physical and emotional abuse throughout their marriage. Income Tax Deficiency On November 9, 2000, following an examination of the 1998 return, respondent determined a deficiency in the Spruills’ 1998 income tax liability of $1,943 (the deficiency). The deficiency resulted principally from the omission from the return of an item of business income received by Mr. Spruill: $6,907 of gross receipts from Thunder Alley Joint Venture (the Thunder Alley receipts). Petitioner did not contest the deficiency, but, on December 12, 2000, she did request relief from liability for the deficiency as a so-called innocent spouse. On August 15, 2002, respondent issued a notice of final determination (the notice) denying petitioner’s request for innocent spouse relief. Petition On October 30, 2002, petitioner timely filed a petition seeking our review of the notice. OPINION I. Introduction As a general rule, spouses filing joint Federal income tax returns are jointly and severally liable for all taxes shown on the return or found to be owing. Sec. 6013(d)(3). In certainPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011