Robert E. Corrigan - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          as the operator and sole proprietor of an activity in which he              
          claimed to be engaged in the trade or business of buying and                
          selling options and commodities.                                            
               Petitioner claimed and respondent disallowed a theft loss of           
          $21,000 for 1987.  Petitioner’s claim was on the basis of a                 
          report he filed with the local police reflecting a $21,000 theft            
          of cash from his Newport Beach home.  There was no evidence of              
          forced entry, and petitioner’s claimed theft was not solved or              
          verified by local authorities.  Petitioner did not seek                     
          reimbursement of the claimed $21,000 loss from his homeowner’s              
          insurance company.                                                          
               During 1987 through 1991, petitioner was employed by Smith             
          Barney as an account executive in Newport Beach, California.  He            
          earned commissions of $1,081,313, $321,692, $527,900, $361,105,             
          and $205,064 for 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1991, respectively.            
          On his 1987 through 1991 returns, petitioner claimed and                    
          respondent disallowed expenses for work-related travel as                   
          itemized deductions on the Schedules A, Itemized Deductions,                
          attached to each return.                                                    
               Smith Barney, as a broker, and petitioner, as a Smith Barney           
          employee, dealt in syndicated stock offerings during 1987 and               
          1988, which differed from regular stock transactions in that the            
          underwriting of the stock involved risk to the broker.  Because             
          of the increased risk, the transaction commissions were                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011