Robert E. Corrigan - Page 21

                                       - 21 -                                         
               The gains and losses in the three brokerage accounts were              
          allocated by respondent according to which person owned the                 
          account.  At trial, petitioner testified that he was the sole               
          owner of all three accounts and was entitled to all the claimed             
          losses.  His testimony, however, was inconsistent with the                  
          allegations in his petition alleging a joint venture with Mrs.              
          Corrigan on the accounts.  To some extent, petitioner’s testimony           
          on this point was inconsistent.  For example, he contradicted               
          himself as to whether the proceeds of sales in the account in               
          Mrs. Corrigan’s name were remitted to her.  Petitioner did not              
          provide any corroborating testimony or evidence supporting his              
          claim that the account ownership, in substance, differed from the           
          form.                                                                       
               Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s allocations of the                
          capital gains and/or losses from the three accounts.                        
               IV.  Deduction of Payments Claimed as Brokerage Commission             
               Rebates                                                                
               While employed as a stockbroker during 1987 and 1988,                  
          petitioner was responsible for servicing Smith Barney customers,            
          including JLB Capital, a sole proprietorship owned by Bergman.              
          Petitioner earned $1,081,313 and $321,692 in commissions from               
          that activity during 1987 and 1988, respectively.  Also for 1987            
          and 1988, petitioner claimed reductions in income for “rebates”             








Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011