- 4 -
On November 17, 2004, petitioner informed respondent that
petitioner had prepared a schedule of stock transactions for the
years in issue and was waiting for an appointment to have his tax
returns prepared. On November 22, 2004, petitioner told
respondent that he had scheduled such an appointment for November
23, 2004, and that he anticipated his returns being prepared and
completed shortly thereafter. On November 24, 2004, we filed
respondent’s status report in which respondent requested an
additional 45 days, until January 9, 2005, for the parties to
file decision documents or a status report. We granted the
parties’ request for an extension by order dated November 29,
2004.
On December 28, 2004, respondent requested that petitioner
submit his delinquent returns on or before January 5, 2005.
Respondent also warned petitioner that if petitioner did not make
progress in preparing and filing his delinquent returns,
respondent would request that petitioner’s case be called for
trial during the next New York, New York, trial session. On
January 3, 2005, petitioner informed respondent that petitioner
did not have his returns prepared. Respondent again warned
petitioner that if he did not receive petitioner’s returns by
January 5, 2005, he would request that the case be restored to
the general docket and calendared for trial at the next New York,
New York, trial session. On January 5, 2005, petitioner informed
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011