Zachary S. and Lisa C. Curello - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
               Respondent issued a notice of deficiency to petitioners in             
          which respondent disallowed petitioners’ claimed exemption for              
          BMC for the 2001 taxable year as well as a portion of the child             
          tax credit in the amount of $600.                                           
                                     Discussion4                                      
          A.  Deductions for Dependency Exemptions                                    
               Section 151(a) authorizes deductions for the exemptions                
          provided by that section.  In particular, section 151(c)(1)                 
          provides an exemption for each of a taxpayer’s dependents as                
          defined in section 152.                                                     
               Section 152(a)(1) defines the term “dependent” to include a            
          taxpayer’s child, provided that more than half of the child’s               
          support was received from the taxpayer or is treated under                  
          section 152(e) as received from the taxpayer.                               
               In the case of a child of divorced parents, section                    
          152(e)(1) provides as a general rule that the child shall be                
          treated as receiving over half of his or her support from the               
          custodial parent.  In the event of so-called split or joint                 
          custody, “‘custody’ will be deemed to be with the parent who, as            
          between both parents, has the physical custody of the child for             
          the greater portion of the calendar year.”  Sec. 1.152-4(b),                


          4We decide the issues in this case without regard to the                    
          burden of proof.  Accordingly, we need not decide whether the               
          general rule of sec. 7491(a)(1) is applicable in this case.  See            
          Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438 (2001).                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011