-30- estimated tax for taxable year 2000, we find that respondent has satisfied respondent's burden of production with respect to the addition to tax under section 6654(a) for that year. In that event, we further find on the instant record (1) that none of the exceptions in section 6654(e) applies13 and (2) that petitioner is liable for the addition to tax under section 6654(a) for taxable year 2000. In the event that the calculation relating to section 6654 were to establish that petitioner did not underpay his estimated tax for taxable year 2000, we find that respondent has not satisfied respondent's burden of production with respect to the addition to tax under section 6654(a) for that year and that petitioner is not liable for such addition to tax. We have considered all of the contentions and arguments of petitioner that are not discussed herein, and we find them to be without merit, irrelevant, and/or moot. To reflect the foregoing and the concessions of the parties, Decision will be entered under Rule 155. 13Petitioner does not take the position that one or more of the exceptions in sec. 6654(e) apply in the instant case.Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Last modified: May 25, 2011