James W. Davis and Teri A. Davis - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners’ Federal             
          income tax for the taxable year 2001 in the amount of $4,238.               
               The issue for decision is whether a lump-sum payment of                
          Social Security disability benefits, received by petitioner Teri            
          A. Davis in 2001, is includable in petitioners’ gross income for            
          2001 (pursuant to the formula in section 86(a)), even though a              
          significant portion of the payment is attributable to benefits              
          for 1999 and 2000.  We hold that it is.                                     
                                     Background                                       
               Some of the facts have been stipulated, and they are so                
          found.                                                                      
               At the time that the petition was filed, petitioners resided           
          in Canton, New York.                                                        
               In 1999, petitioner Teri A. Davis (Mrs. Davis) suffered an             
          injury and applied for Social Security disability benefits.                 
          However, the Social Security Administration resisted her claim.             
          Mrs. Davis then retained legal counsel.  Ultimately, after many             
          months, Mrs. Davis prevailed in the dispute, and she received a             
          lump-sum payment of benefits in 2001.                                       
               For 2001, Mrs. Davis received a Form SSA-1099, Social                  
          Security Benefit Statement, from the Social Security                        
          Administration.  Box 3 of that form reported “benefits for 2001”            
          of $21,656, which was described as follows:                                 







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011