Joseph A. and Sari F. Deihl - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         
               C.  Evidentiary Issue                                                  
               At trial, petitioners sought to introduce into evidence a              
          20-minute videotape.  Mr. Deihl explained that videos were taken            
          of conventions, training sessions, and other KareMor events.                
          Clips from the collection of tapes so generated were then used to           
          create the 20-minute summary video offered at trial.  Respondent            
          objected to admission of the video based on rules 401, 901(a),              
          1001, 1002, and 1006 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which                
          rules address relevance, authentication, the requirement of                 
          original recordings, and use of summaries.  The Court reserved              
          ruling on the tape’s admissibility and took the matter under                
          advisement.                                                                 
               Having had an opportunity to review the totality of the                
          record in light of the specific issues presented by these cases,            
          the Court believes respondent’s concerns as to relevancy are well           
          taken.  Rule 401 of the Federal Rules of Evidence defines                   
          “relevant evidence” as “evidence having any tendency to make the            
          existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination           
          of the action more probable or less probable than it would be               
          without the evidence.”   Mr. Deihl stated that the video tape               
          depicted “Actions at the conventions, the entertainers, the                 
          arrivals, the pomp and circumstances, the pageantry, the gowns              
          worn”.  Counsel for petitioners expressed the proffer as follows:           
               it is offered as for illustrative purposes as to what                  
               happened with respect to the training sessions, what’s                 





Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011