Dennis O. Fultz and Linda G. Fultz - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
               b.  Petitioners’ Member Activity With MCP                              
               In 1993, petitioners jointly received value-added payments             
          from MCP of $73,813.10; for 1994 petitioners received total                 
          value-added payments of $50,302.50; for 1995 Mr. Fultz received             
          value-added payments of $23,652.  The record for Mrs. Fultz for             
          1995 is incomplete, but the amount she received is not disputed             
          by the parties.  The amounts of the value-added payments had no             
          impact on the amounts petitioners were to receive under the                 
          leases.                                                                     
               c.  Petitioners’ Income Tax Returns and Respondent’s                   
               Determinations                                                         
               Petitioners timely filed their 1993, 1994, and 1995 Federal            
          income tax returns.  With respect to self-employment tax,                   
          petitioners completed and attached to their 1993, 1994, and 1995            
          Federal income tax returns Section B-Long Schedules SE,                     
          Computation of Self-Employment Tax.  Petitioners reported self-             
          employment tax of $423, $220, and zero for 1993, 1994, and 1995,            
          respectively.                                                               
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that                
          petitioners’ self-employment income from MCP was $49,500,                   
          $53,225, and $72,325 for 1993, 1994, and 1995, respectively.                
          These amounts do not match the actual value-added payments to               
          petitioners because respondent made adjustments based on the                
          amount and timing of the net payments from Fultz Farms to                   
          petitioners per the lease related to the value-added payments               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011