Allen and Mary Doxtator - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
               On February 8, 1999, a check for $5,000, payable to Mr.                
          Doxtator, and drawn by Melinda Doxtator, his mother, cleared her            
          account.                                                                    
               Petitioners reported no capital gains on their 1999 return.            
          Respondent determined that petitioners received $15,720 in 1999             
          from the sale of stocks in which they had a basis of $14,720,               
          resulting in short-term capital gain of $1,000 in 1999.                     
          Respondent further determined that petitioners had long-term                
          capital gain of $146 in that year.                                          
          Dividend Income                                                             
               Petitioners reported no dividend income on their 1999                  
          return.  Respondent determined that petitioners failed to report            
          $281 of taxable dividends in 1999.                                          
          Oneida Tribe payments                                                       
               During 1999, petitioners each received $1,500 from the                 
          Oneida Tribe and were issued Forms 1099 that reported these                 
          payments as nonemployee compensation.                                       
               The payments constituted a distribution of the profits from            
          a casino owned and operated by the Oneida Tribe.  The casino (and           
          an associated hotel) were built on land purchased by the Oneida             
          Tribe from "noncompetent"5 Tribe members in 1968.  The Tribe                

               5 "A noncompetent Indian is one who holds allotted lands               
          only under a trust patent and may not dispose of his property               
          without the approval of the Secretary of the Interior.  It does             
          not denote mental incapacity."  Stevens v. Commissioner, 452 F.2d           
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011