- 9 -
With regard to the August 26, 2003, mailing to the Court,
respondent has conceded $2.67, but petitioners claim $117.70 for
postage and related office supplies. The amended petition
consists of the same number of pages as the original petition,
and we conclude that petitioners likely incurred the same cost to
mail the amended petition as they incurred to mail the original
petition, or $4.65. The record does not contain any
substantiation of additional office supplies purchased in
connection with this mailing, and we do not award petitioners any
amount with regard thereto.
With regard to the March 19, 2004, mailing to respondent,
respondent has conceded $2.67, but petitioners claim $4.42. The
March 19, 2004, letter is not contained in the record, but
respondent has conceded its existence, and in light of the
established cost of petitioners’ other mailings, we conclude that
petitioners incurred a cost of $4.42 to mail the March 19, 2004,
letter to respondent.
With regard to the two April 2004 Federal Express deliveries
(one to respondent and one to the Court), respondent has conceded
the full amounts claimed by petitioners.
With regard to an alleged April 2004 mailing, petitioners
claim $8.50 for postage and office supplies. The record does not
contain any substantiation of this purported mailing.
With regard to the June 8, 2004, mailing to the Court of the
five-page revised expense report, petitioners claim to have
incurred an estimated cost of $9.60. The evidence indicates that
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011