Harlan D. Edwards and Floors by Harlan, Jody Edwards, Trustee - Page 28

                                       - 28 -                                         
         a consequence, we are satisfied that respondent has met his                  
         burden of production with respect to this issue.  As petitioners             
         do not argue, nor do we find, that Harlan qualifies for an                   
         exception listed in section 6654(e), respondent’s determination              
         is sustained.                                                                
         VIII. Conclusion                                                             
              We have considered all remaining arguments made by the                  
         parties for contrary holdings and, to the extent not addressed,              
         find them to be irrelevant, moot, or meritless.                              
              To reflect the foregoing,                                               

                                                 Decision will be entered             
                                            under Rule 155.                           

























Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  

Last modified: May 25, 2011